Get Your Religion Away From My Vagina

On February 22, 2012, 4:35 PM by

Why religion and politics don’t mix with reproductive health.

My vagina grew up with the crazy notion that America, in addition to being the land of the free, is prized for its separation of church and state. So when exactly did religion start governing our politics and influencing American policy? And why on Earth do Catholics and Mormons and Evangelicals get a say in something that likely won’t affect Catholics, Mormons or Evangelicals at all? It seems to me that someone who doesn’t believe in birth control or abortion probably won’t seek either of them. It stands to reason that birth control and abortion access should have pretty much no effect on any “God-Fearing” populations. Access to birth control and abortion does, however, affect my vagina.

My vagina is still undecided as to whether or not it would like to stretch itself over 10 centimeters to push out a 9 pound infant and feed it and clothe it for the next 18 years to life. While it’s not completely outside the realm of possibilities, my vagina would still like a say in the matter. And rest assured, if that day ever comes my vagina will not be consulting the Catholic Church on its position. My vagina doesn’t care what the Church of Latter Day Saints has to say, either. My vagina is more concerned about having a loving partnership, the support of family, a stable home with a steady income, healthcare, maintaining a healthy lifestyle and being able to protect the sovereign mind of its progeny from the ever-reaching grasp of ideologues, bigamists and fanatics: the Catholic, Mormon and Evangelical churches, respectively.

My vagina would also like to know why these religious leaders and their political representatives need to concern themselves with what goes in or comes out of it. I mean, if inquisitions like this occurred in the work place, wouldn’t it be considered sexual harassment? How is it all of a sudden acceptable when done en masse?

The US government recently redefined the definition of rape to be “The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” Shouldn’t laws and religious doctrines that penetrate my vagina without its consent also be considered rape?

According to a recent article in the Huffington Post, the newly proposed “Heartbeat Informed Consent Act,” spearheaded by Michele Bachmann, “requires doctors to make the fetal heartbeat visible and audible to the woman prior to the abortion procedure and to describe the ultrasound image to her in detail, even if she prefers not to hear about it. If the woman is between four and five weeks pregnant, the doctor has to perform a “transvaginal ultrasound” in order to hear the heartbeat, which involves a probe and can be physically uncomfortable for the woman. ” Again, I believe this qualifies as a sexual assault by nearly every state’s own definition.

And you know, my vagina isn’t religious and isn’t usually this political either. My vagina just wants options and, frankly, a choice between celibacy or being a baby factory isn’t going to cut it. My vagina doesn’t want to be forced to do anything it doesn’t want to do or isn’t ready for. My vagina doesn’t want to be probed by the state on behalf of your religious indoctrinations. Your religion and your politics have nothing to do with my vagina. When you get your own vagina, you can do whatever you want to it and I promise I won’t intrude, probe or penetrate. In the meantime, get your religion away from my vagina!

Comments

  • Britman

    Damn straight. I’m a British man, but being forced to have an extra and possibly uncomfortable and needless vaginal probe so you can be forced to listen to a hearbeat if you’re going for an abortion? This is just a nasty, nazi thing.

  • JenniLoveLeigh

    I definitely whole-heartedly agree with the birth control part. Nowadays, religious bodies need to recognize that some contraceptives are also used for health measures. Condoms protect against disease, and birth control pills can be necessary for hormonal regulation in some cases. Fortunately, some churches like the Catholic church are starting to address these issues (even if they aren’t so happy about it).

    I also think that while some religious doctrines hold substantial moral value, they have no place in politics. I’m pro-choice in the sense that I think that no woman should have such a decision forced on her. As many greats have said: Shit happens. And we all know some people are not in a position or even general mental state to be a parent much less a good one. Each woman should make that decision on her own. As far as whether abortion is “right” or “wrong” is a separate issue completely, and there are far too many different circumstances such as how far along the woman is (whether it’s 3 weeks or 3 months) and cases such as rape. Religious bodies do need to keep their noses out of politics, but that’s not the only reason some people think abortion is wrong. Children are precious and it’s most certainly one of the most important, life-changing decisions a woman can ever make when she contemplates terminating a pregnancy.

    However, I do find myself questioning your point about transvaginal ultrasounds being a violation similar to rape. Personally, I think that an early term pregnancy doesn’t always strike women, young women in particular, as being completely real. If someone’s going to make a decision about abortion, shouldn’t they have every opportunity to make the best decision including being able to hear a heartbeat and see an image which takes the hard-to-imagine idea of a fetus that still looks like a lizard to the realization “Wow. There’s a little human growing inside of me”?

    And for that matter, a doctor needs to make sure that a woman is competent and completely aware of the decision she is making and what it means for the sake of 1) the patient’s emotional well-being and 2) the doctor’s medical license because they could be subject to a lawsuit if a former patient came forward with accusations. If anything, such regulations probably protect a woman’s right to choose because such situations would make it a lot easier to argue a case against abortion.

  • VagOfFreedom

    I completely agree; all decisions should be left up to each individual woman. I would like to offer an idea about women electing abortions: instead of forcing them to have an ultrasound, how about providing them with a free counseling session just to discuss thoughts, feelings, and possible options and to encourage birth control for prevention of future pregnancies?

  • John

    thinking with your vagina

  • Anon

    does your vagina need me to give it said birth control? or can it do that itself? because personally, i don’t like buying or providing stuff for other that I don’t use nor belief the use of to be ethical. Do you wish to buy me ammunition to shoot bambi? Just because you don’t use it doesn’t mean I don’t…

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Grammy nominated songwriter <a href="">Amanda Richards is a creative, do-it-yourself extraordinaire. When she’s not writing about women’s or attempting to unravel the mysteries of American politics, she enjoys performing, painting, and feng shui interior decorating. Richards is currently living in Guatemala City where she is recording her 5th Album.

Facebook

Facebook

Twitter

Twitter