Does The Supreme Court Rely On One Man’s Decision?

On April 25, 2012, 1:06 PM by

After a string of 5-4 decisions, will the Supreme Court’s ruling on Obamacare prove the President’s assertion of judicial activism correct?

anthony-kennedy

The fate of President Obama’s crowning achievement of his first term — the passing of the healthcare reform law — seemingly rests on the shoulders of one Supreme Court Justice. After repeated 5-4 rulings decided recent cases, what initially seemed to be mere suspicions of a court neatly divided along party lines has become something of a known fact. Divided between four staunchly conservative and four staunchly liberal justices, Anthony Kennedy has become the one and only swing vote on the Supreme Court.

Dialogue-shifting decisions that have painted a picture of a bench divided along liberal/conservative lines include 2010’s Berghuis v. Thompkins ruling, in which the court essentially ruled to loosen an arrested citizen’s Miranda rights. That same year, the Supreme Court ruled on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, where they determined that political spending is protected under the First Amendment. This year brought the decision on Florence v. Burlington County, in which the court ruled that police may strip search anyone arrested for any offense, even if there is no reason to suspect contraband.

In each of the above Supreme Court decisions, Justice Anthony Kennedy was the deciding factor. Siding with the conservative wing of the court (Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Chief Justice John Roberts), Kennedy was able to swing cases with significant impact on how the Constitution is interpreted and enforced.

Kennedy Obamacare Protest

Meanwhile, the liberal wing of the court (Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan) has failed more often than not in convincing Kennedy to join their side while court watchers have accepted that Kennedy is once again going to be the 5th vote on Obamacare. This prompted a show of preventative action by President Oama when he recently claimed the potential overturning of his healthcare law would be nothing more than judicial activism. Decrying such a ruling as “unprecedented,” President Obama said he was confident that the court would not overturn what is an act that passed through the democratic process of Congress.

Comments

  • Farnk20

    I hate to break it to you Mr. Siegel, but the Supreme Court isn’t nearly as politicized as they say. The facts simply don’t back you up.
    http://www.scotusblog.com/statistics/
    By the looks of the graph, only about 16% of cases decided this term were a 5-4 decision.
    For comparison, 58% were unanimously decided 9-0.
    I suggest fact-checking before your next article.

    • Bsiegel01

      Thanks for your comment; that certainly is important to keep in mind that in the grand scheme of things it is a small percentage of votes that end up as ‘swing votes.’ However, why I believe Kennedy is so influential is because when there is a swing vote, he almost always decides the issue, and they are usually of considerable importance.
      When there is a Kennedy swing vote, it’s for a big decision: he decided the ruling on the courts’ decision for abortion, the death penalty, discrimination, campaign finances that led to super-pacs, and criminal procedure cases.
      He was the 5th vote in 20 of 25 cases in the term ending in 2009, 12 of the 17 cases in 2012, and 14 of the 16 cases in the term that ended last year.

      I found it interesting that the court, in recent years, was so usually divided on philosophical lines with Kennedy deciding the issue. Again, thanks so much for taking time to read my article and leave a comment.

  • Pingback: Justice Kennedy: The Man Running The Supreme Court? | Prose Before Hos

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Benjamin will be completing his undergraduate career at Bellarmine University this May, graduating with a B.A. in Political Science and minor in Economics. He has worked as a law clerk for a Louisville Law Firm and volunteers at the local Legal Aid Society and Catholic Charities Immigration Legal Services.

Facebook

Facebook

Twitter

Twitter